I feel that Leonard's thesis is explaining that our resources are coming to a slight end. We are using more of our resources that are provided for us and when it comes to generations down the road we are going to run slim to out totally of them.  We are buying products that are structured to hurt our planet and this is not a good thing to have in our resources. Another thing that the video provides is information about it is leading to our health as a hazard as well. Like listed in the video "The erosion of local economies show a constant supply of people with no there option but to work in a hazards environment". Globally 200,000 people a day are moving to a job similar to this because they do not have a option. This is all just leading to bigger mistakes. We need to find a way to change the world before it get worse or even put tolls on our planets life. We are killing the resources and without them we cannot function as a community or make better for our life's.


Leonards primary purpose is to persuade the audience to tell the world and industries that the way we are using our resources are killing not just the planet but us as well. The toxic fumes are everywhere and are coming in toxic matter to young humans. The most primary source that the fumes are coming from are shockingly from mothers breast milk. They are filled with toxics that can make babies in risk of getting sick. Leonards purpose is to persuade people to help make the world a better place to live rather a place when we will eventually run out of resources and need more in the future.  She was being opinionated when explaining that the system material economically is actually called the system of crises and she actually backs the information up. our economy and government are all doing things so wrong. She is using feeling a cause of bias in her expression of things. She is saying babies and people are getting hurt over this.